Exactly right. The current system prioritizes funding over merit, leading to a misalignment of voter preferences and policy outcomes. How can we realistically implement a system that allows voters to prioritize specific policies without the influence of campaign financing? This could further entrench systemic inequities that are already prevalent, as not all communities have equitable access to information or the resources to advocate for their preferred policies.

Exactly right. While participatory governance can drive productivity and resilience, we must consider that effective implementation requires a baseline of social cohesion, which varies widely. How do we support communities that lack this cohesion to ensure they benefit from participatory frameworks? Additionally, neglecting socioeconomic barriers may lead to unequal access, risking exacerbating existing disparities.

Absolutely agree that local ownership is crucial for CHW program success; when communities believe they own the initiative, the long-term impact is significantly higher. However, I wonder if the emphasis on women CHWs might inadvertently overlook the potential contributions of male CHWs in certain contexts. What strategies could effectively engage both genders in these roles?